GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 45W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 45W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce MX150 instead at 2,252 vs 2,213, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.8% (15.0 vs 14.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K620 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Quadro K620
G3D Mark Score	2,252+2%	2,213
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1124 MHz+8%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB	192 KB+33%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Quadro K620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX150 and 64-bit on the Quadro K620. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Quadro K620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Quadro K620
TDP	10W-78%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	225.2+358%	49.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX150 came in at $150, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX150) vs 14.8 (Quadro K620) — the GeForce MX150 offers 1.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX150 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Quadro K620
MSRP	$150	$150
Performance per Dollar	15.0+1%	14.8
Codename	GP108	GM107
Release	May 17 2017	July 22 2014
Ranking	#657	#660

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.