GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K620
GeForce MX150
Popular choices:
Quadro K620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank 304 and the Quadro K620 is on rank 99, so the Quadro K620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and Quadro K620
GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,252+2% | 2,213 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1124 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 192 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-78% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 225.2+358% | 49.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX150 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Quadro K620 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.5 (GeForce MX150) vs 73.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 96.8% better value. The GeForce MX150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $30-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.5 | 73.8+97% |
| Codename | GP108 | GM107 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #657 | #660 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX150 and Quadro K620
