GeForce MX150 vs RadeonT 660M
GeForce MX150
Popular choices:
RadeonT 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank 304 and the RadeonT 660M is on rank 226, so the RadeonT 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The RadeonT 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 660M.
| Insight | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and RadeonT 660M
GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.
RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,252+1% | 2,221 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.459 TFLOPS+83% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1900 MHz+83% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-75% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 225.2+306% | 55.5 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #657 | #565 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX150 and RadeonT 660M
