GeForce MX150 vs RadeonT 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX150 vs RadeonT 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX150 vs RadeonT 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 40W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 660M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅20.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 40W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 660M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce MX150 instead at 2,252 vs 2,221, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX150 vs RadeonT 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,252+1%	2,221
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+83%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1900 MHz+83%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+13%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RadeonT 660M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX150 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
Encoder	No	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
TDP	10W-75%	40W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	225.2+306%	55.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 660M (2023 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce MX150	RadeonT 660M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	GP108	Rembrandt+
Release	May 17 2017	January 3 2023
Ranking	#657	#565

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 660M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.