GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce MX150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce MX150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce MX150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅72.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
32.7% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 72.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,252), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.3% (15.0 vs 11.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce MX150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the GeForce MX150 reaches 2,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the GeForce MX150 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 384 (GeForce MX150). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
G3D Mark Score	2,275+1%	2,252
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	336	384+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS+14%	0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	448 KB+211%	144 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX150 carries 2 GB. GeForce MX150 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX150.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	48 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
Encoder	—	No
Decoder	—	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	H.264	H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the GeForce MX150's 10W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (GeForce MX150). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
TDP	160W	10W-94%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	14.2	225.2+1486%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 came in at $199, while the GeForce MX150 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX150 was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 15.0 (GeForce MX150) — the GeForce MX150 offers 31.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX150 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	GeForce MX150
MSRP	$199	$150-25%
Performance per Dollar	11.4	15.0+32%
Codename	GF104	GP108
Release	July 12 2010	May 17 2017
Ranking	#652	#657

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.