GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

CPU

GPU

GeForce MX150

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce MX150

2 GB 10

2,252

+1.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Radeon Pro WX 3200

4 GB 65

2,209

0.0%

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce MX150 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
32.7% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce MX150 instead at 2,252 vs 2,209, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 35.2% (15.0 vs 11.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 3200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,252+2%	2,209
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.385 TFLOPS+74%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB	160 KB+11%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX150 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX150 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	No	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 146.7% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	10W-85%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-9%	82°C
Perf/Watt	225.2+562%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX150 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce MX150 was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX150) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce MX150 offers 35.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP	$150-25%	$199
Performance per Dollar	15.0+35%	11.1
Codename	GP108	Polaris 23
Release	May 17 2017	July 2 2019
Ranking	#657	#659

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.