GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce MX150

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce MX150

2,252

+1.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2,209

0.0%

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700U

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3550H

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank 304 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is on rank 131, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

100%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

93%

#294

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

723%

#296

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

656%

#297

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

654%

#301

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

595%

#302

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

591%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

98%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

95%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

98%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

93%

#116

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1331%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

100%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

99%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

96%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

96%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

90%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

90%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

89%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

89%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

88%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

87%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

86%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 238.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+238.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($60)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX150 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,252+2%	2,209
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.385 TFLOPS+74%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB	160 KB+11%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX150 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	No	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 146.7% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce MX150	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	10W-85%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-9%	82°C
Perf/Watt	225.2+562%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX150 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The GeForce MX150 costs 69.8% less ($139 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.5 (GeForce MX150) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce MX150 offers 237.8% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).