GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce MX150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce MX150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce MX150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅60.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 100W vs 10W.

GeForce MX150

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 100W, a 90W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,274 vs 2,252), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce MX150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560M SLI

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI scores 2,274 and the GeForce MX150 reaches 2,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce MX150 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 384 (GeForce MX150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
G3D Mark Score	2,274	2,252
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M SLI and 64-bit on the GeForce MX150.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	48 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.0	4.6+15%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs No (GeForce MX150). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce MX150's 10W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce MX150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
TDP	100W	10W-90%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	90°C	75°C-17%
Perf/Watt	22.7	225.2+892%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce MX150 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560M SLI	GeForce MX150
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	N12E-GS	GP108
Release	January 6 2011	May 17 2017
Ranking	#632	#657

Search GeForce GTX 560M SLI on Amazon

Search GeForce MX150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.