
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro K620

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro K620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro K620?
The matchup between the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the legacy low-profile professional Quadro K620 reveals the massive divide between modern enthusiast power and basic workstation graphics. The RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 3500% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle 2D display tasks to a card that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of fast VRAM and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS support. The Quadro K620 features only 2GB of VRAM and lacks the core count or bandwidth to handle modern software. Moving from a legacy workstation card to an RTX 3060 Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and stability needed for high-end rendering and creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it represents several generations of rendering progress and provides the stability and detail needed for a world-class PC experience. The Quadro K620 is now strictly for basic display output and legacy productivity on budget machines. if you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the RTX 3060 Ti is the definitive choice for enthusiasts by a wide margin.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 817.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+817.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-817.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $280 for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, it costs 89% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro K620

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro K620's 2,213 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 817.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+818% | 2,213 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+1167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1777% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+48% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+533% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+2426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+107% | 49.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Quadro K620 costs 89.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 73.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 1.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $150-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $30-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.5 | 73.8+2% |
| Codename | GA104 | GM107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #660 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











