GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K620
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro K620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro K620?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy low-profile professional Quadro K620 reveals the massive divide between modern power and basic workstation graphics. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle 2D display tasks to a card that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB of VRAM and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3. The Quadro K620 features only 2GB of VRAM and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from a legacy workstation card to an RTX 4060 Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual fidelity needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The Quadro K620 is strictly for basic display output and legacy productivity on budget machines. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 923.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+923.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-923.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 23.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K620
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K620's 2,213 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 923.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+924% | 2,213 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1033% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2456% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+126% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+467% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2163% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 45W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+188% | 49.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Quadro K620 costs 92.1% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 73.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 23.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $150-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $30-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6 | 73.8+24% |
| Codename | AD106 | GM107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #660 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K620
