GRID M60-1B vs RadeonT 660M
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
RadeonT 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-1B is positioned at rank 357 and the RadeonT 660M is on rank 226, so the RadeonT 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RadeonT 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 660M.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M60-1B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1B and RadeonT 660M
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256+2% | 2,221 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+231% | 1.459 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1900 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-1B) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 55.5+455% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #525 | #565 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M60-1B and RadeonT 660M
