GRID M60-1B vs Quadro K3100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-1B vs Quadro K3100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-1B vs Quadro K3100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-1B

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (2,283 vs 2,256), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-1B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M60-1B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K3100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M60-1B vs Quadro K3100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-1B

The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the Quadro K3100M reaches 2,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).

Feature	GRID M60-1B	Quadro K3100M
G3D Mark Score	2,256	2,283+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+345%	1.084 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+1100%	64 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-1B	Quadro K3100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-1B has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K3100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-1B and 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-1B	Quadro K3100M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-1B	Quadro K3100M
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	10.0	30.4+204%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M60-1B (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID M60-1B	Quadro K3100M
MSRP	$2500	—
Codename	GM204	GK104
Release	August 30 2015	July 23 2013
Ranking	#525	#653

Search GRID M60-1B on Amazon

Search Quadro K3100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.