
FirePro V8800

GRID M60-1B
FirePro V8800 vs GRID M60-1B Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8800 vs GRID M60-1B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V8800 vs GRID M60-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 225W, a 151W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
GRID M60-1B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌204.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 74W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8800 vs GRID M60-1B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V8800
The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.

GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8800 scores 2,281 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V8800) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B).
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,281+1% | 2,256 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+337% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 768 KB+860% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-1B carries 2 GB. FirePro V8800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8800 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-1B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V8800) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V8800) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_1+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8800 draws 74W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 101% difference. The FirePro V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8800) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.8+208% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8800 came in at $1499, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro V8800 was 40% cheaper ($1001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro V8800) vs 0.9 (GRID M60-1B) — the FirePro V8800 offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-1B (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V8800 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5+67% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Juniper | GM204 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #525 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














