Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 5870

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

2014Core: 1058 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5870

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 5870 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 5870 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 5870: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 170% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 188W, a 143W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 5870

2009

Why buy it

  • 56.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 166% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 317.8% higher power demand at 188W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 5870 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K620 instead at 2,213 vs 2,180, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 170% (14.8 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 5870 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 5870 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

AMD

Radeon HD 5870

The Radeon HD 5870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 23 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 188W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon HD 5870 reaches 2,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5870). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 2.72 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5870).

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon HD 5870
G3D Mark Score
2,213+2%
2,180
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1600+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
2.72 TFLOPS+215%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
192 KB+20%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon HD 5870
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5870. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5870) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon HD 5870
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 5870's 188W — a 122.7% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon HD 5870
TDP
45W-76%
188W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
49.2+324%
11.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the Radeon HD 5870 launched at $399. On MSRP, Quadro K620 was 62.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD 5870) — the Quadro K620 offers 169.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K620 (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureQuadro K620Radeon HD 5870
MSRP
$150-62%
$399
Performance per Dollar
14.8+169%
5.5
Codename
GM107
Cypress
Release
July 22 2014
September 23 2009
Ranking
#660
#663

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.