Quadro K620 vs Quadro M600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Quadro M600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Quadro M600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅13.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M600M instead at 2,221 vs 2,213, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K620 vs Quadro M600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620	Quadro M600M
G3D Mark Score	2,213	2,221
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+28%	0.6728 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+28%	876 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24+50%	16
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	Quadro M600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and 64-bit on the Quadro M600M.

Feature	Quadro K620	Quadro M600M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K620	Quadro M600M
TDP	45W	30W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	49.2	74.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M600M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K620	Quadro M600M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	GM107	GM107
Release	July 22 2014	August 18 2015
Ranking	#660	#658

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Search Quadro M600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.