
Radeon 550 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Radeon 550
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon 550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 550.
| Insight | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $79 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 144% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+144%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($79) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 550 and Radeon Pro WX 3200

Radeon 550
The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 550 scores 2,140 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 550) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 550) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,140 | 2,209+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.385 TFLOPS+14% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 550) vs 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 550 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 550) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-23% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.8+26% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 550 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $79, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Radeon 550 costs 60.3% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.1 (Radeon 550) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon 550 offers 144.1% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-60% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $79-60% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1+144% | 11.1 |
| Codename | Lexa | Polaris 23 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | July 2 2019 |
| Ranking | #668 | #659 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















