
Radeon 550 vs Radeon 820M

Radeon 550
Popular choices:

Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 820M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2017). The Radeon 820M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon 550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 820M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 550.
| Insight | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 820M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $79 for the Radeon 550, it costs 68% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 216.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+216.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 550 and Radeon 820M

Radeon 550
The Radeon 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 550 scores 2,140 and the Radeon 820M reaches 2,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3+, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 550) vs 128 (Radeon 820M). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,140 | 2,143 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+300% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 2900 MHz+145% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 550 draws 50W versus the Radeon 820M's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 550) vs 350W (Radeon 820M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 42.8 | 71.4+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 820M costs 68.4% less ($54 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.1 (Radeon 550) vs 85.7 (Radeon 820M) — the Radeon 820M offers 216.2% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 550 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $79 | $25-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1 | 85.7+216% |
| Codename | Lexa | Krackan Point |
| Release | April 20 2017 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #668 | #669 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















