
Radeon RX 540 vs Radeon R9 M385

Radeon RX 540
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 540 is positioned at rank 235 and the Radeon R9 M385 is on rank 420, so the Radeon RX 540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 540
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M385.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $60), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 540 and Radeon R9 M385

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 540 scores 2,134 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 540) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,134+4% | 2,061 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 896+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz+11% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 224 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (Radeon RX 540) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M385) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M385. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 540) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon RX 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 540 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 540) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 42.7+55% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 540 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 540 costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.4 (Radeon RX 540) vs 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 55.2% better value. The Radeon RX 540 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 540 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-33% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.4+55% | 34.4 |
| Codename | Lexa | Strato |
| Release | November 11 2017 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #602 | #674 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















