
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) vs GRID K520

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GRID K520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is positioned at rank 92 and the GRID K520 is on rank 350, so the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GRID K520
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550 (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550 (móvel) and GRID K520

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.

GRID K520
The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) scores 3,500 and the GRID K520 reaches 3,516 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID K520 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (GRID K520). Raw compute: 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,516 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536 ×2+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.647 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128 ×2+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) draws 50W versus the GRID K520's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 350W (GRID K520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0+349% | 15.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID K520 launched at $3599 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.5 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 70.3 (GRID K520) — the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers 24.5% better value. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-98% | $3599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.5+24% | 70.3 |
| Codename | Lexa | GK104 |
| Release | July 2 2017 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #614 | #540 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














