Radeon RX 5500 vs Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 295X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (307mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $200 for the Radeon R9 295X2, it costs 45% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 84% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+84%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500 and Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500 scores 8,837 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1845 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,837+1% | 8,734 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2816 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1845 MHz+81% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 176 ×2+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 295X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 1329.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s x2+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit x2+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500 draws 110W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 127.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 5500) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 180mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-78% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-55% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 180mm | 307mm |
| Height | 110mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3+359% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499 and now averages $200. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 45% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 43.7 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 83.8% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-88% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-45% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3+84% | 43.7 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Vesuvius |
| Release | October 7 2019 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #297 | #303 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5500 and Radeon R9 295X2
