Radeon RX 5500 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5500.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $120 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black, it costs 8% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500 and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500 scores 8,837 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 1845 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,837 | 9,177+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2880+105% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS | 5.645 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1845 MHz+88% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500 draws 110W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 5500) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 180mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-56% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-25% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 180mm | 267mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3+119% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 and now averages $120. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 8.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 5% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-82% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-8% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3+5% | 76.5 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK110B |
| Release | October 7 2019 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #297 | #288 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5500 and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
