
Radeon RX 5500M vs FirePro D300

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:

FirePro D300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5500M is positioned at rank 46 and the FirePro D300 is on rank 130, so the Radeon RX 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro D300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $100 for the Radeon RX 5500M, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 380.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+380.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and FirePro D300

Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 and the FirePro D300 reaches 5,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the FirePro D300 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 1,280 (FirePro D300). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,954+4% | 5,722 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+10% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+113% | 2.176 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 12 (FirePro D300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the FirePro D300's 150W — a 55.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 350W (FirePro D300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-43% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0+84% | 38.1 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D300 costs 80% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 286.1 (FirePro D300) — the FirePro D300 offers 380.8% better value. The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $20-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5 | 286.1+381% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Pitcairn |
| Release | October 7 2019 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #400 | #506 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















