Radeon RX 5500M
VS
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Radeon RX 5500M vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

2019Core: 1375 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5500M is positioned at rank 46 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is on rank 408, so the Radeon RX 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#36
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
182%
#38
165%
#39
165%
#43
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
150%
#44
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
149%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
100%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
99%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
98%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
98%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#398
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1448%
#400
1312%
#401
1309%
#405
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1190%
#406
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1182%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
100%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
97%
#411
96%
#412
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#413
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
96%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
94%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
93%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
92%
#419
92%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
92%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 5500M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5500M.

InsightRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 5500M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $200 for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+98.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
5,954
6,000
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
2560+82%
Boost Clock
1645 MHz+83%
900 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 37.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
307.2 GB/s (Dual)+37%
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit (Dual)+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
TDP
85W-57%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
70.0+133%
30.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 5500M costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the Radeon RX 5500M offers 98.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MRadeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$100-50%
$200
Performance per Dollar
59.5+98%
30.0
Codename
Navi 14
Neptune CF
Release
October 7 2019
March 1 2014
Ranking
#400
#348