Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 5500M is positioned at rank #46 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 430.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5500M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-430.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+430.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5500M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 83% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 11.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 430.4%. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,954 | 31,578+430% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 7680+445% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+766% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2610 MHz+59% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5500M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5500M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 108.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-70% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0 | 110.8+58% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M costs 83.1% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the Radeon RX 5500M offers 11.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-83% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5+11% | 53.5 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | AD104 |
| Release | October 7 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #400 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5500M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
