Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce MX570
Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5500M is positioned at rank 46 and the GeForce MX570 is on rank 117, so the Radeon RX 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5500M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $120 for the GeForce MX570, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and GeForce MX570
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,954+4% | 5,738 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+42% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 88+38% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+133% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 25W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0 | 229.5+228% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M costs 16.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 47.8 (GeForce MX570) — the Radeon RX 5500M offers 24.5% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-17% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5+24% | 47.8 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GA107 |
| Release | October 7 2019 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #400 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5500M and GeForce MX570
