Radeon RX 550X vs Radeon Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 550X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.

Insight	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 550X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $99 for the Radeon Pro, it costs 55% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 121.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+121.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($45)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 550X Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550X and Radeon Pro

Radeon RX 550X

The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 550X scores 2,381 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
G3D Mark Score	2,381	2,366
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 5.1
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	512	3840+650%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	13.06 TFLOPS+978%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz	1700 MHz+44%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	240+650%
L1 Cache	128 KB	960 KB+650%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 550X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 550X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon RX 550X) vs Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro). Decoder: VCE vs Unified Video Decoder.

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
Encoder	UVD	Unified Video Decoder
Decoder	VCE	Unified Video Decoder
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 550X draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550X) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon RX 550X	Radeon Pro
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	241mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	47.6+401%	9.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 550X launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0 and now averages $99. The Radeon RX 550X costs 54.5% less ($54 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.9 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 23.9 (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 121.3% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).