
Radeon RX 550X
Popular choices:

FirePro M6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 550X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 550X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 550X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $45 for the Radeon RX 550X, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 57.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+57.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550X and FirePro M6100

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550X scores 2,381 and the FirePro M6100 reaches 2,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550X is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro M6100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 896 (FirePro M6100). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,381 | 2,495+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 896+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS+63% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 224 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 550X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M6100 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 550X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 550X) vs 256 KB (FirePro M6100) — the Radeon RX 550X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 12 (FirePro M6100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon RX 550X) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100). Decoder: VCE vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X) vs H.264 (FirePro M6100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCE | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550X draws 50W versus the FirePro M6100's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550X) vs 350W (FirePro M6100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 47.6+187% | 16.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550X launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the FirePro M6100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M6100 costs 33.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.9 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 83.2 (FirePro M6100) — the FirePro M6100 offers 57.3% better value. The Radeon RX 550X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $30-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.9 | 83.2+57% |
| Codename | Lexa | Emerald |
| Release | December 16 2018 | May 27 2014 |
| Ranking | #642 | #638 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















