Radeon RX 5600 vs Quadro M6000
Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5600 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5600.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $500 for the Quadro M6000, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 232.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+232.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5600 and Quadro M6000
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5600 scores 11,753 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5600 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1265 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,753 | 11,769 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.829 TFLOPS | 6.844 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1265 MHz+14% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5600 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 10.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 317 GB/s+10% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5600 draws 150W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5600) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.4+66% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 and now averages $500. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.4 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 23.5 (Quadro M6000) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 233.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-95% | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-70% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.4+234% | 23.5 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GM200 |
| Release | July 7 2020 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #295 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5600 and Quadro M6000
