Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (270mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 14,923 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296 | 14,923+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2130 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 298.5+276% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD107 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #167 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
