
Radeon RX 5700

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌61.7% longer card at 270mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅37.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 270mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌124% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296 | 14,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1957 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 167mm |
| Height | 110mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 205.2+158% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 5700 came in at $379, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5700 was 55.4% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 123.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-55% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+123% | 16.9 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GB206 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #167 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















