Radeon RX 5700 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (270mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 197.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296 | 14,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1957 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 167mm |
| Height | 110mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 205.2+158% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 and now averages $748. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 66.6% less ($498 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 57.2 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 197.9% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-55% | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-67% | $748 |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.2+198% | 19.2 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GB206 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #167 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
