
Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (270mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $350 versus $400 for the Radeon RX 6650M XT, it costs 13% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 10.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($350) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary and Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1680 MHz to 1980 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,562 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon RX 6650M XT
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 16,562 and the Radeon RX 6650M XT reaches 17,071 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Raw compute: 10.14 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 9.896 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Boost clocks: 1980 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,562 | 17,071+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.14 TFLOPS+2% | 9.896 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1980 MHz | 2416 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 120W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 270mm | — |
| Height | 110mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6 | 142.3+93% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT launched at $400 and now averages $400. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary costs 12.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.3 (Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary) vs 42.7 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary offers 10.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $400-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350-13% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.3+11% | 42.7 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #120 | #113 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















