Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Radeon RX 6400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6400 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 6400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $139 for the Radeon RX 6400, it costs 28% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 41.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($139) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6400 and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6400 scores 7,728 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design reaches 7,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2321 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,728 | 7,853+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.565 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 2321 MHz+57% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 480 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6400) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 (Limited) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6400 draws 53W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 40.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6400) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 172mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 53W-34% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 172mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 145.8+48% | 98.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design costs 28.1% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.6 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 41.2% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $139 | $100-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.6 | 78.5+41% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GP106 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #330 | #401 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6400 and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
