Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon RX 6400
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $139 versus $180 for the Radeon Pro WX 7100, it costs 23% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 30% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($139) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6400 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6400 scores 7,728 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 2321 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,728 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.565 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 2321 MHz+87% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 576 KB+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6400) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 (Limited) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6400 draws 53W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 84.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6400) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 172mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 53W-59% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 172mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 145.8+146% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $139, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 and now averages $180. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 22.8% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.6 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 42.8 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 29.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-80% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $139-23% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.6+30% | 42.8 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 19 2022 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #330 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6400 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
