CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500 XT.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 90.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500 XT and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 9,603 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 2815 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,603 | 9,741+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 4096+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.765 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+49% |
| Boost Clock | 2815 MHz+168% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 255.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 64-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144 GB/s | 512 GB/s+256% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 4096-bit+6300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 (Limited) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500 XT draws 107W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 88% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 172mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 107W-61% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 172mm | 195mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 89.7+153% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 and now averages $80. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.0 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers 90.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-69% | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $80-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.0 | 121.8+90% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Fiji |
| Release | January 19 2022 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #270 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6500 XT and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
