CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Mobile.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6500 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500 XT and RTX A2000 Mobile
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 9,603 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2815 MHz vs 1687 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,603+1% | 9,506 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.765 TFLOPS | 8.637 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2815 MHz+67% | 1687 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.5 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) — the RTX A2000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 (Limited) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500 XT draws 107W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 11.9% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 172mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 107W | 95W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 172mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.7 | 100.1+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GA107 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #270 | #273 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6500 XT and RTX A2000 Mobile
