
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌226.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌157% higher power demand at 275W vs 107W.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 107W instead of 275W, a 168W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2815 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,741+1% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+49% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2815 MHz+168% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 255.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+256% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+6300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 88% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 107W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 172mm |
| Height | 115mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4 | 89.7+153% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X came in at $649, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6500 XT was 69.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon RX 6500 XT offers 222% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6500 XT (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $199-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 48.3+222% |
| Codename | Fiji | Navi 24 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #282 | #270 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















