Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VS
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6500 XT

2022Core: 2610 MHzBoost: 2815 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
113%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
109%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
108%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
107%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
107%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
107%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
105%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
105%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
104%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
104%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
102%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
100%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
100%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
100%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
99%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
99%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
97%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
96%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
96%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
94%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
94%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
94%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
93%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
93%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
93%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
93%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
92%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
92%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500 XT.

InsightRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 90.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+90.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and Radeon RX 6500 XT

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon RX 6500 XT

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2815 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
G3D Mark Score
9,741+1%
9,603
Architecture
GCN 3.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
4096+300%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+49%
5.765 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2815 MHz+168%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
256+300%
64
L1 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 255.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
HBM
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+256%
144 GB/s
Bus Width
4096-bit+6300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
Encoder
VCE 3.0
None
Decoder
UVD 6.0
VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 88% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
TDP
275W
107W-61%
Recommended PSU
600W
400W-33%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
195mm
172mm
Height
115mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-7%
70°C
Perf/Watt
35.4
89.7+153%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 64.0 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers 90.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XRadeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP
$649
$199-69%
Avg Price (30d)
$80-47%
$150
Performance per Dollar
121.8+90%
64.0
Codename
Fiji
Navi 24
Release
June 24 2015
January 19 2022
Ranking
#282
#270