
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500 XT.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 90.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and Radeon RX 6500 XT

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2815 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,741+1% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+49% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2815 MHz+168% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 255.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+256% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+6300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 88% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 107W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 172mm |
| Height | 115mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4 | 89.7+153% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 64.0 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers 90.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $199-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-47% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.8+90% | 64.0 |
| Codename | Fiji | Navi 24 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #282 | #270 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















