G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 275W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌450% higher power demand at 275W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 275W, a 225W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌450% higher power demand at 275W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) better than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) averages 1.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 10,119 vs 9,741 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 275W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 9,741 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
1080p
low	90 FPS	92 FPS
medium	81 FPS	80 FPS
high	67 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	84 FPS	76 FPS
medium	72 FPS	66 FPS
high	57 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	30 FPS
medium	37 FPS	27 FPS
high	25 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
1080p
low	201 FPS	243 FPS
medium	177 FPS	205 FPS
high	141 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	176 FPS
medium	119 FPS	145 FPS
high	96 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	98 FPS
medium	73 FPS	80 FPS
high	58 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
1080p
low	455 FPS	438 FPS
medium	364 FPS	351 FPS
high	286 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	219 FPS
1440p
low	341 FPS	329 FPS
medium	273 FPS	263 FPS
high	218 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	164 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	219 FPS
medium	182 FPS	175 FPS
high	131 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	110 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
1080p
low	388 FPS	160 FPS
medium	317 FPS	133 FPS
high	258 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	314 FPS	116 FPS
medium	255 FPS	98 FPS
high	191 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	71 FPS
medium	114 FPS	58 FPS
high	101 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score	10,119+4%	9,741
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	4096+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+183%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz+41%	1050 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	256+300%
L1 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	512 GB/s+78%
Bus Width	192-bit	4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 138.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP	50W-82%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	—	195mm
Height	—	115mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	202.4+472%	35.4