GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 275W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌450% higher power demand at 275W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119+4% | 9,741 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 4096+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+183% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+41% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 138.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 195mm |
| Height | — | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+472% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Codename | TU116 | Fiji |
| Release | April 23 2020 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #324 | #282 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
