GRID P40-2Q
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GRID P40-2Q vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-2Q vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID P40-2Q vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 275W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌778.1% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ❌36.9% longer card at 267mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,050 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 792.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-2Q vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581 | 9,741+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 256+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 20% difference. The GRID P40-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-18% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 195mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6+20% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-2Q came in at $5699, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X was 88.6% cheaper ($5050 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers 782.4% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $649-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 15.0+782% |
| Codename | GM204 | Fiji |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #282 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-2Q and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
