GRID P40-2Q vs RTX A2000 Mobile

GRID P40-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1687 MHz

GRID P40-2Q vs RTX A2000 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-2Q vs RTX A2000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 136.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 95W.

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 95W instead of 225W, a 130W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (9,581 vs 9,506), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A2000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A2000 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-2Q vs RTX A2000 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-2Q

The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1687 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
9,581
9,506
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS+79%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1687 MHz+43%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
2.5 MB+233%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Mobile.

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 81.3% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
TDP
225W
95W-58%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
42.6
100.1+135%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A2000 Mobile (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P40-2QRTX A2000 Mobile
MSRP
$5699
Codename
GM204
GA107
Release
August 30 2015
April 12 2021
Ranking
#433
#273

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.