GRID P40-2Q
Intel Arc Pro A60
GRID P40-2Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-2Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID P40-2Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1399.7% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,319 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1386% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-2Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581 | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS+74% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2050 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q and System on the Intel Arc Pro A60. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 73.0+71% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-2Q came in at $5699, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro A60 was 93.3% cheaper ($5319 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 1370.6% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $380-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 25.0+1371% |
| Codename | GM204 | DG2-256 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #433 | #275 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-2Q and Intel Arc Pro A60
