Arc A730M vs GRID P40-2Q

Intel

Arc A730M

2022Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS

GRID P40-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Arc A730M vs GRID P40-2Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A730M vs GRID P40-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A730M

2022

Why buy it

  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

GRID P40-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A730M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (9,808 vs 9,581), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A730M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A730M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A730M vs GRID P40-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-2Q

The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GRID P40-2Q reaches 9,581 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID P40-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
G3D Mark Score
9,808+2%
9,581
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+50%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.6 TFLOPS+161%
4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+74%
1178 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
192+50%
128
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+500%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-2Q carries 4 GB. Arc A730M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc A730M and 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q).

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GRID P40-2Q's 225W — a 95.1% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 500W (GRID P40-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
TDP
80W-64%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
122.6+188%
42.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A730M (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureArc A730MGRID P40-2Q
MSRP
$5699
Codename
DG2-512
GM204
Release
2022
August 30 2015
Ranking
#264
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.