Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

AMD

Radeon 8040S

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 8040S

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $249 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 62.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 275W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • 39.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 62.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 275W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 8040S instead at 9,756 vs 9,741, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 8040S is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 8040S makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.5% (24.4 vs 15.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 8040S

The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 8040S scores 9,756 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8040S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 8040S) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,756
9,741
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GCN 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
4096+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.734 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+50%
Boost Clock
2800 MHz+167%
1050 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
256+300%
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 8040S and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
System
512 GB/s
Bus Width
System
4096-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8040S) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder
VCN 4.5
VCE 3.0
Decoder
VCN 4.5
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 8040S draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 8040S) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP
55W-80%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
195mm
Height
0mm
115mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
177.4+401%
35.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 8040S came in at $400, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon 8040S was 38.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon 8040S offers 62.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 8040S (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 8040SRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
MSRP
$400-38%
$649
Performance per Dollar
24.4+63%
15.0
Codename
Strix Halo
Fiji
Release
January 6 2025
June 24 2015
Ranking
#265
#282

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.