
GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8040S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8040S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The Radeon 8040S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8040S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 970.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $400 for the Radeon 8040S, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 690.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+690.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 9,756+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664+63% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 5.734 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2800 MHz+138% |
| ROPs | 56+75% | 32 |
| TMUs | 104+63% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 55W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 177.4+176% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon 8040S launched at $400 and now averages $400. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 87.5% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 192.8 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 690.2% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-88% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 192.8+690% | 24.4 |
| Codename | GM204 | Strix Halo |
| Release | September 19 2014 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #269 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















