
GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 970
2014GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile better than GeForce GTX 970?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 970 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 712 MHz to 1057 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4.329 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1057 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 10,080+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 2048+23% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 4.329 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+11% | 1057 MHz |
| ROPs | 56+40% | 40 |
| TMUs | 104+63% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.61 MB | 2 MB+228% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+17% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 134.4+109% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GA107 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #269 | #290 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













