GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 970.

Insight	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 970 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 58.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+58.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 970 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

GeForce GTX 970

The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score	9,640	9,741+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1664	4096+146%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.92 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+119%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+12%	1050 MHz
ROPs	56	64+14%
TMUs	104	256+146%
L1 Cache	0.61 MB	1 MB+64%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	512 GB/s+129%
Bus Width	256-bit	4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder	NVENC 2nd gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP6	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970	Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP	150W-45%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	195mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	65°C-19%
Perf/Watt	64.3+82%	35.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 192.8 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 58.3% better value. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).