
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 970 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 9,815+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664+44% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1708 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 56+17% | 48 |
| TMUs | 104+44% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 624 KB+44% | 432 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 970 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+17% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 120W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 81.8+27% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 192.8 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 1.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $199-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 192.8 | 196.3+2% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP106 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | August 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #269 | #272 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















