Arc A730M vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A730M vs Radeon RX 6500 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A730M vs Radeon RX 6500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A730M

2022

Why buy it

✅89.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 107W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 6500 XT is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 48.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6500 XT

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌33.8% higher power demand at 107W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A730M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 89.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (9,808 vs 9,603), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6500 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc A730M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6500 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A730M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A730M vs Radeon RX 6500 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

Radeon RX 6500 XT

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) with 384 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
G3D Mark Score	9,808+2%	9,603
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3072+200%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.6 TFLOPS+119%	5.765 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz	2815 MHz+37%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	192+200%	64
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+1700%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+50%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A730M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT carries 4 GB. Arc A730M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 133.3% advantage for the Arc A730M. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc A730M and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500 XT. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+133%	144 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	None
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 28.9% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A730M	Radeon RX 6500 XT
TDP	80W-25%	107W
Recommended PSU	500W	400W-20%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	172mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	122.6+37%	89.7