Radeon RX 6500M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6500M is positioned at rank #73 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6500M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Radeon RX 6500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500M scores 7,443 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti reaches 7,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,443 | 7,525+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.915 TFLOPS+245% | 1.425 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+300% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the Radeon RX 6500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144 GB/s | 192 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 6 (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 4 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 148.9 | 150.5+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $77 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GK106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #341 | #633 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6500M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
