
Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500M and Tesla M60

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6500M scores 7,443 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the Radeon RX 6500M leads by 6.3%. The Radeon RX 6500M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,443+6% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.915 TFLOPS+2% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+104% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500M draws 50W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 148.9+539% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GM204 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #341 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












