Radeon RX 6650M XT vs RTX A4500 Mobile
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Popular choices:
RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M XT
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A4500 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6650M XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6650M XT and RTX A4500 Mobile
Radeon RX 6650M XT
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.
RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 17,071 and the RTX A4500 Mobile reaches 16,613 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Raw compute: 9.896 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 17.66 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 184.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,071+3% | 16,613 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.896 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz+61% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 5.8 MB+1060% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 46+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6650M XT comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Mobile) — the RTX A4500 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 2 Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6650M XT draws 120W versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 140W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT) vs 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M XT | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-14% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 142.3+20% | 118.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6650M XT and RTX A4500 Mobile
