Radeon RX 6700 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $300 for the Radeon RX 6700, it costs 0% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700 and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700 scores 18,920 and the GeForce RTX 4060 reaches 19,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,920 | 19,548+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.29 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz | 2460 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 24 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+50% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 17.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB+25% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+18% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 24 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6700) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700 draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 41.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 6700) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 115W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.1 | 170.0+57% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 3.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $299-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.1 | 65.4+4% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | AD107 |
| Release | June 9 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #90 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6700 and GeForce RTX 4060
