Radeon RX 6700 vs RTX A4000
Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (16 GB vs 10 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6700.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 260% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+260%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700 and RTX A4000
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700 scores 18,920 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700) vs 48 (RTX A4000) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,920 | 19,463+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.29 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+70% |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz+57% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 48+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 40% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 16 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700 draws 175W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 6700) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 140W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.1 | 139.0+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111 and now averages $1111. The Radeon RX 6700 costs 73% less ($811 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the Radeon RX 6700 offers 260.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-66% | $1111 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-73% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.1+261% | 17.5 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GA104 |
| Release | June 9 2021 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #90 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6700 and RTX A4000
