
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $423 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 233.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+233.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($423) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB scores 20,096 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,096 | 20,669+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.21 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+65% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 37.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+37% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.4 | 295.3+267% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $423, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1450. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 70.8% less ($1027 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 232.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-86% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $423-71% | $1450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.5+232% | 14.3 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | AD104 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #75 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














